|
Home |
Racing
| Features
| Multimedia
| Reference
|
Moderators: ErikIrvine, ChaseTruck754, Ryan_P
Ryan_P wrote:Alright. Having learned a few things on my own, both good and bad, I thought I would start a discussion regarding proper assembly of a beam front end.
My questions are primarily regarding the assembly of a link pin front end, using thru-rods. Here they are..
- When do you know the thru-rods are too tight, or not tight enough?
- The same for link pins. When do you know that the link pin is too tight? I assume using loctite is best, but on the inner, outer, or both?
- How much toe in, if any, is optimal on the front end? 1/8'' fine?
Thanks in advance, just looking to start a good topic for future reference and new comers.
Steve? Jim? Erik? Let's hear your opinions..

Ryan_P wrote:Thanks guys, I really appreciate it.
On a prerunner application, how often do you recommend replacing beam bushings, link-pin bushings, link pics, etc.?

Ryan_P wrote:Alright. Having learned a few things on my own, both good and bad, I thought I would start a discussion regarding proper assembly of a beam front end.
My questions are primarily regarding the assembly of a link pin front end, using thru-rods. Here they are..
- When do you know the thru-rods are too tight, or not tight enough?
- The same for link pins. When do you know that the link pin is too tight? I assume using loctite is best, but on the inner, outer, or both?
- How much toe in, if any, is optimal on the front end? 1/8'' fine?
Thanks in advance, just looking to start a good topic for future reference and new comers.
Steve? Jim? Erik? Let's hear your opinions..
5racer wrote:they pretty much coverd it only thing i do differ is snug up through rods realy good they seem to work loose even with two nuts .and if theres any thread showing on bolts and links i safty wire around the threads .
partybarge_pilot wrote:5racer wrote:they pretty much coverd it only thing i do differ is snug up through rods realy good they seem to work loose even with two nuts .and if theres any thread showing on bolts and links i safty wire around the threads .
So I take it from this that none of you guys are using thrust bearings on the through rods? Actually, why are you still using through rods at all?
Ryan_P wrote:Besides through rods, what would you use?
. It's amazing how stuck in their ways VW guys are, like I said before, there are so many loopholes in the rules that nobody seems to want to take advantage of and their all going to cry foul as soon as someone does.partybarge_pilot wrote:Ryan_P wrote:Besides through rods, what would you use?
Thrust bearing with a quick release pin. I can make arms that are removable in less than 30sec. I haven't really looked at beam cars in about 10+ years. It's hard to believe they are still doing the same things. It's amazing how stuck in their ways VW guys are, like I said before, there are so many loopholes in the rules that nobody seems to want to take advantage of and their all going to cry foul as soon as someone does.

partybarge_pilot wrote:5racer wrote:they pretty much coverd it only thing i do differ is snug up through rods realy good they seem to work loose even with two nuts .and if theres any thread showing on bolts and links i safty wire around the threads .
So I take it from this that none of you guys are using thrust bearings on the through rods? Actually, why are you still using through rods at all?
5racer wrote:iv had a idea for a more bullet prof arm for a few years its the money thing or r-d that has held me back.and savage,s way of running tech and rules that real scare,s me one year its ok then its not kinda like the 5 open car that has a diesel motor in it with a turbo.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest